Alicja Śliwicka - czarodziejka z Eindhoven

 


Kiedy zobaczycie dzisiejszą partię Alicji Śliwickiej z Laurą Unuk, przyznacie mi (B.S.) rację, że Polka musiała chyba zaczarować swoją rywalkę. Na diagramie pozycja po 42 posunięciach: 


Mamy końcówkę W+G na W+G. Czarne mają dwa piony więcej, na dodatek gońce są różnopolowe. Owszem, biały król jest aktywny, ale to może jedynie dawać nadzieję białym, że partii nie przegrają.
Dacie wiarę że to Ala wygra tą partię?

Koniecznie to zobaczcie:



Partia mi si� podoba�a (ChessBase 16)
[Event "Round 6: Alicja Sliwicka - Laura Unuk"] [Site "lichess.org"] [Date "2023.08.15"] [Round "?"] [White "Alicja Sliwicka"] [Black "Laura Unuk"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C60"] [Annotator "https://lichess.org/@/SergioGlorias"] [PlyCount "171"] [EventDate "2023.??.??"] {[%evp 0,171,25,16,10,25,29,15,46,55,57,46,37,33,6,5,1,9,8,-35,5,-20,-38,-38, -44,-51,-44,-36,-20,-18,-14,1,23,2,6,-18,-50,-69,-17,-62,-48,-120,-81,-112, -131,-118,-127,-138,-134,-161,-156,-142,-155,-160,-175,-185,-192,-189,-191, -195,-146,-154,-149,-149,-100,-180,-53,-82,-83,-144,-157,-160,-164,-202,-207, -195,-192,-185,-176,-164,-183,-172,-172,-172,-175,-166,-173,-157,-162,-162, -135,-142,-142,-142,-155,-160,-162,-155,-132,-139,-146,-177,-109,-168,-181, -164,-166,-190,-198,-215,-258,-283,-287,-288,-187,-288,-33,-42,0,0,0,0,175,188, 192,186,194,208,225,225,225,180,186,193,202,193,210,186,186,186,189,241,257, 263,263,335,346,364,412,365,366,371,485,378,511,450,463,463,463,463,523,523, 532,463,462,505,604,696,949,527,547,547,547,537]} 1. e4 {[%eval 36,0]} e5 { [%eval 35,0]} 2. Nf3 {[%eval 29,0]} Nc6 {[%eval 32,0]} 3. Bb5 {[%eval 34,0]} Nge7 {[%eval 53,0]} 4. Nc3 {[%eval 56,0]} Ng6 {[%eval 34,0]} 5. h4 {[%eval 47, 0]} Be7 {[%eval 43,0]} 6. h5 {[%eval 58,0]} Nh4 {[%eval 44,0]} 7. Nxh4 { [%eval 5,0]} Bxh4 {[%eval 49,0]} 8. h6 {[%eval 28,0]} g6 {[%eval 22,0]} 9. Nd5 {[%eval 13,0]} Nd4 {[%eval 21,0]} 10. Bc4 {[%eval 8,0]} c6 {[%eval 0,0]} 11. Ne3 {[%eval 0,0]} b5 {[%eval 5,0]} 12. Bb3 {[%eval 32,0]} d6 {[%eval 3,0]} 13. c3 {[%eval 31,0]} Qf6 $6 {[%eval 24,0] Inaccuracy. Nxb3 was best.} (13... Nxb3 14. axb3 O-O 15. d4 a5 16. b4 exd4 17. Qxd4 Bf6 18. Qd3 a4 19. O-O Re8 20. f4) 14. g3 {[%eval 3,0]} Nxb3 {[%eval 2,0]} 15. axb3 {[%eval 2,0]} Bg5 {[%eval 0,0] } 16. d4 {[%eval 1,0]} O-O {[%eval 2,0]} 17. f3 {[%eval 39,0]} Qe7 {[%eval 26, 0]} 18. Qe2 $6 {[%eval 84,0] Inaccuracy. b4 was best.} (18. b4 f5 19. exf5 Bxf5 20. Nxf5 Rxf5 21. O-O Raf8 22. dxe5 Bxc1 23. Rxc1 dxe5 24. Qe2 Qg5) 18... a6 { [%eval 54,0]} 19. Bd2 {[%eval 84,0]} Be6 {[%eval 67,0]} 20. O-O {[%eval 8,0]} Bxb3 {[%eval -74,0]} 21. f4 {[%eval -54,0]} exf4 {[%eval 94,0]} 22. gxf4 { [%eval 97,0]} Bxh6 {[%eval -89,0]} 23. Qg2 {[%eval -63,0]} Kh8 {[%eval -33,0]} 24. Rae1 {[%eval -52,0]} Qh4 {[%eval -71,0]} 25. Rf3 {[%eval 9,0]} Be6 { [%eval -73,0]} 26. Ref1 {[%eval -100,0]} d5 {[%eval 9,0]} 27. f5 $2 {[%eval -178,0] Mistake. exd5 was best.} (27. exd5 cxd5 28. Be1 Qe7 29. Qh2 Bg7 30. f5 Bxf5 31. Nxf5 gxf5 32. Rh3 Rfe8 33. Rxh7+ Kg8) 27... gxf5 {[%eval -11,0]} 28. Rh3 {[%eval -18,0]} Bxe3+ {[%eval -188,0]} 29. Bxe3 {[%eval -37,0]} Qg4 { [%eval -15,0]} 30. exf5 {[%eval -14,0]} Bxf5 {[%eval -92,0]} 31. Rg3 {[%eval -6,0]} Qe4 $6 {[%eval 96,0] Inaccuracy. Qh5 was best.} (31... Qh5) 32. Bh6 $2 { [%eval -141,0] Mistake. Qf2 was best.} (32. Qf2 Rg8 33. Bg5 h6 34. Qxf5 Qxf5 35. Rxf5 Rxg5 36. Rgxg5 hxg5 37. Rxf7 a5 38. Kf2 Kg8) 32... Qxg2+ $4 {[%eval 0, 0] Blunder. Rg8 was best.} (32... Rg8 33. Bg5 Qe6 34. Rf4 f6 35. Qf2 Rxg5 36. Rxg5 fxg5 37. Rxf5 Re8 38. Re5 Qg6 39. Qe2) 33. Rxg2 $6 {[%eval 93,0] Inaccuracy. Kxg2 was best.} (33. Kxg2) 33... Be4 {[%eval -99,0]} 34. Bg7+ $6 { [%eval -194,0] Inaccuracy. Bxf8 was best.} (34. Bxf8 Bxg2) 34... Kg8 {[%eval -166,0]} 35. Rg3 {[%eval -163,0]} Rfe8 {[%eval -149,0]} 36. Kf2 {[%eval -297,0] } Re6 {[%eval -292,0]} 37. Be5+ {[%eval -222,0]} Rg6 $2 {[%eval -200,0] Mistake. Kf8 was best.} (37... Kf8 38. Ke2 a5 39. Rg4 Bg6 40. Rgf4 Rae8 41. Rf6 c5 42. Ke3 c4 43. Kd2 Ke7 44. Rxe6+) 38. Ke3 {[%eval -91,0]} a5 {[%eval -9,0]} 39. Rf6 {[%eval -1,0]} Rc8 {[%eval -17,0]} 40. Kf4 {[%eval -32,0]} Kf8 { [%eval -23,0]} 41. Bd6+ {[%eval -17,0]} Ke8 {[%eval -6,0]} 42. Rgxg6 {[%eval -91,0]} Bxg6 {[%eval -186,0]} 43. Kg5 {[%eval -199,0]} Kd7 {[%eval -183,0]} 44. Be5 {[%eval -28,0]} b4 {[%eval -22,0]} 45. cxb4 {[%eval -187,0]} axb4 {[%eval -188,0]} 46. Bg3 $6 {[%eval -300,0] Inaccuracy. Rd6+ was best.} (46. Rd6+ Ke7) 46... b3 {[%eval -195,0]} 47. Rf3 {[%eval -295,0]} Rg8 $6 {[%eval -167,0] Inaccuracy. c5 was best.} (47... c5 48. dxc5 Rxc5 49. Rxb3 d4+ 50. Kg4 h5+ 51. Kf3 Rd5 52. Bf4 d3 53. Bd2 Rf5+ 54. Kg3) 48. Kf6 {[%eval -172,0]} Bc2 {[%eval -15,0]} 49. Kxf7 $6 {[%eval -148,0] Inaccuracy. Re3 was best.} (49. Re3) 49... Rg4 {[%eval -5,0]} 50. Be5 {[%eval -166,0]} Re4 {[%eval -9,0]} 51. Rf6 { [%eval -6,0]} Re2 {[%eval -23,0]} 52. Rd6+ {[%eval -1,0]} Kc7 {[%eval -21,0]} 53. Ke7 $4 {[%eval -377,0] Blunder. Rxd5+ was best.} (53. Rxd5+ Kb6 54. Rd8 Be4 55. d5 Bxd5+ 56. Kf6 Kb5 57. Rd7 Be4 58. Kg5 Bg6 59. Bc3 c5) 53... Kb6 { [%eval -371,0]} 54. Rd8 {[%eval -397,0]} Kb5 {[%eval -367,0]} 55. Rb8+ { [%eval -386,0]} Kc4 {[%eval -396,0]} 56. Rb6 {[%eval -329,0]} c5 $6 {[%eval -261,0] Inaccuracy. Bd3 was best.} (56... Bd3) 57. Rc6 {[%eval -211,0]} Kb4 $4 {[%eval 43,0] Blunder. Bd3 was best.} (57... Bd3 58. Ke6 Rxb2 59. dxc5 Rf2 60. Rb6 d4 61. c6 Bf5+ 62. Ke7 d3 63. c7 Bc8 64. Rb8) 58. Kd6 {[%eval 49,0]} c4 $6 {[%eval 48,0] Inaccuracy. Be4 was best.} (58... Be4) 59. Rb6+ {[%eval 54,0]} Ka5 {[%eval 36,0]} 60. Kc5 {[%eval 0,0]} Rg2 $4 {[%eval 509,0] Blunder. c3 was best.} (60... c3 61. Rb8 Ka6 62. Kc6 Ka7 63. Rb7+ Ka6 64. Rb4 Ka5 65. bxc3 b2 66. Bc7+ Ka6 67. Rb6+) 61. Bc7 {[%eval 408,0]} Rg7 {[%eval 405,0]} 62. Rc6+ { [%eval 491,0]} Rxc7 {[%eval 497,0]} 63. Rxc7 {[%eval 404,0]} Ka6 {[%eval 491,0] } 64. Kxd5 {[%eval 389,0]} Bd3 {[%eval 502,0]} 65. Ke5 $6 {[%eval 325,0] Inaccuracy. Rc6+ was best.} (65. Rc6+ Ka5 66. Rc8 h5 67. Kc5 Ka6 68. Kb4 Kb6 69. Rc5 Be2 70. d5 h4 71. Rc6+ Kb7) 65... Kb6 {[%eval 349,0]} 66. Rc8 {[%eval 306,0]} Kb7 {[%eval 353,0]} 67. Rc5 {[%eval 306,0]} Kb6 {[%eval 359,0]} 68. Kf4 {[%eval 347,0]} Bf1 $6 {[%eval 451,0] Inaccuracy. h5 was best.} (68... h5 69. Kg5 Be2 70. Kh4 Ka7 71. d5 Kb6 72. d6 Kxc5 73. d7 c3 74. d8=Q c2 75. Qd2) 69. Ke3 {[%eval 494,0]} Bd3 {[%eval 503,0]} 70. Kd2 {[%eval 506,0]} Bf1 {[%eval 584,0]} 71. Kc3 {[%eval 622,0]} Be2 {[%eval 561,0]} 72. Kb4 {[%eval 564,0]} h5 {[%eval 597,0]} 73. d5 {[%eval 619,0]} Bg4 {[%eval 637,0]} 74. Rxc4 {[%eval 600,0]} Bd7 {[%eval 606,0]} 75. Kxb3 {[%eval 635,0]} Bg4 $6 {[%eval 902,0] Inaccuracy. Bb5 was best.} (75... Bb5 76. Rc8 Ba6 77. Rh8 Kc5 78. d6 Kc6 79. Rxh5 Bc8 80. Rh6 Kc5 81. Ka4 Bg4 82. b4+) 76. Kc3 $6 {[%eval 591,0] Inaccuracy. Kb4 was best.} (76. Kb4 Kb7 77. Kc5 Kc7 78. Rf4 Kd7 79. b4 Ke8 80. b5 Bc8 81. d6 Bb7 82. Ra4 Kd8) 76... Bd7 {[%eval 682,0]} 77. Kd4 {[%eval 644,0]} h4 $6 { [%eval 1100,0] Inaccuracy. Bb5 was best.} (77... Bb5 78. Rc8 Bd7 79. Rh8 Bg4 80. Rh7 Kb5 81. d6 Kc6 82. Ke5 Kc5 83. d7 Bxd7 84. Rxd7) 78. Ke5 {[%eval 909,0] } h3 {[%eval 927,0]} 79. Rh4 $6 {[%eval 619,0] Inaccuracy. Kd6 was best.} (79. Kd6 Be8 80. Ke7 Bg6 81. Rh4 Bf5 82. d6 Kc6 83. Rh6 Kc5 84. Rh5 Kb4 85. Rxf5 h2) 79... Kc7 $6 {[%eval 1092,0] Inaccuracy. Kc5 was best.} (79... Kc5 80. b4+ Kb6 81. Kf6 Kb5 82. Ke7 Bc8 83. Kd8 Bf5 84. d6 Ka4 85. Kc7 h2 86. Kd8) 80. Rh7 { [%eval 875,0]} Kc8 {[%eval 1123,0]} 81. Kd6 {[%eval 1007,0]} Bf5 {[%eval 1251, 0]} 82. Rh8+ {[%eval 1074,0]} Kb7 {[%eval 1008,0]} 83. Ke7 {[%eval 1104,0]} Kc7 {[%eval 1006,0]} 84. b4 {[%eval 1199,0]} Bg4 {[%eval 1209,0]} 85. b5 $2 { [%eval 566,0] Mistake. Rh6 was best.} (85. Rh6 Be2 86. d6+ Kc6 87. d7+ Kd5 88. d8=Q+ Ke4 89. Rh4+ Kf3 90. Rxh3+ Kg2 91. Rh6 Bf3) 85... Kb6 {[%eval 585,0]} 86. d6 {[%eval 567,0]} 1-0

Komentarze

Najpopularniejsze wpisy miesiąca

2 runda Mistrzostw Świata Juniorów w Brazylii, lekko nie jest

Jak grali polscy juniorzy w 8 rundzie Mistrzostwach Świata Juniorów w Brazylii?

W Mistrzostwach Świata Juniorów w Brazylii po 5 rundach najlepiej spisuje się Patryk Cieślak

Zakończyła się przedostatnia runda Mistrzostw Świata Juniorów w Brazylii, są szanse na medale!