Ciekawe partie Ekstraligi Szachowej: Warakomski Tomasz - Kosakowski Jakub (1-0)
Z wielu partii dzisiejszej, 6 rundy Ekstraligi Szachowej pobraliśmy pojedynek: Warakomski Tomasz - Kosakowski Jakub (1-0). Warto zobaczyć, jak białe wykorzystały zbyt odważną (niektórzy mówią o takiej grze: pseudoaktywność) grę czarnych.
[Event "Polish Ekstraliga"]
[Site "lichess.org"]
[Date "2023.09.23"]
[Round "6.10"]
[White "Warakomski, Tomasz"]
[Black "Kosakowski, Jakub"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B10"]
[WhiteElo "2533"]
[BlackElo "2494"]
[Annotator "https://lichess.org/@/SergioGlorias"]
[PlyCount "101"]
[EventDate "2023.??.??"]
{[%evp
0,101,19,31,68,65,63,51,45,37,38,38,50,33,27,25,20,21,27,19,19,19,54,32,
34,43,31,30,21,29,37,41,43,42,45,53,62,60,52,40,60,29,47,38,39,36,38,23,11,10,
13,-2,0,13,10,18,27,17,31,16,45,49,77,106,118,118,146,117,106,136,128,112,132,
122,122,126,162,229,236,280,289,296,300,200,302,228,295,323,311,351,351,352,
393,324,313,302,295,324,291,329,326,352,348,348]} 1. e4 {[%eval 36,0]}
c6 {
[%eval 37,0]} 2. Nf3 {[%eval 26,0]} d5 {[%eval 27,0]} 3. d3 {[%eval
9,0]} Bg4 {
[%eval 45,0]} 4. h3 {[%eval 48,0]} Bxf3 {[%eval 44,0]} 5. Qxf3 {[%eval
52,0]}
e6 {[%eval 59,0]} 6. Nd2 {[%eval 36,0]} Nd7 {[%eval 51,0]} 7. d4
{[%eval 46,0]}
dxe4 {[%eval 48,0]} 8. Nxe4 {[%eval 26,0]} Ndf6 {[%eval 24,0]} 9. Nxf6+
{
[%eval 23,0]} Nxf6 {[%eval 22,0]} 10. c3 {[%eval 4,0]} Be7 {[%eval
49,0]} 11.
Be2 {[%eval 39,0]} O-O {[%eval 31,0]} 12. O-O {[%eval 36,0]} Qd5
{[%eval 2,0]}
13. Be3 {[%eval 2,0]} Rfd8 {[%eval 9,0]} 14. Rfd1 {[%eval 13,0]} Qxf3
{[%eval
15,0]} 15. Bxf3 {[%eval 1,0]} Nd5 {[%eval 11,0]} 16. Bd2 {[%eval 8,0]}
Bf6 {
[%eval 11,0]} 17. Re1 {[%eval 19,0]} Rd7 {[%eval 6,0]} 18. Re2 {[%eval
12,0]}
h6 {[%eval 3,0]} 19. g3 {[%eval 29,0]} Nb6 {[%eval 22,0]} 20. Rae1
{[%eval 2,0]
} a5 {[%eval 22,0]} 21. h4 {[%eval 12,0]} a4 {[%eval 27,0]} 22. Bg4
{[%eval 26,
0]} Rdd8 {[%eval 2,0]} 23. f4 {[%eval 0,0]} Nc4 {[%eval 14,0]} 24. Bc1
{
[%eval 12,0]} Nd6 {[%eval 52,0]} 25. a3 {[%eval 29,0]} Ra5 {[%eval
48,0]} 26.
h5 {[%eval 34,0]} Nf5 {[%eval 8,0]} 27. Kg2 {[%eval 67,0]} Rb5 {[%eval
71,0]}
28. Bf3 {[%eval 77,0]} Kf8 {[%eval 64,0]} 29. Kh3 {[%eval 73,0]} Ne7
{[%eval
89,0]} 30. g4 {[%eval 78,0]} g6 $6 {[%eval 162,0] Inaccuracy. Ng8 was
best.} (
30... Ng8 31. Be4 Ra5 32. Bc2 Be7 33. Rf1 Bd6 34. g5 Ne7 35. Bd3 Bc7
36. Bd2
Rad5 37. Bc2) 31. hxg6 {[%eval 146,0]} Nxg6 {[%eval 143,0]} 32. Rh1
{[%eval
163,0]} c5 {[%eval 183,0]} 33. dxc5 $6 {[%eval 7,0] Inaccuracy. d5 was
best.} (
33. d5) 33... Rd3 {[%eval 55,0]} 34. Kg3 {[%eval 39,0]} e5 $6 {[%eval
99,0]
Inaccuracy. Nh4 was best.} (34... Nh4) 35. fxe5 {[%eval 81,0]} Nxe5
{[%eval 96,
0]} 36. Bxh6+ {[%eval 101,0]} Kg8 {[%eval 106,0]} 37. Rf1 {[%eval
101,0]} Nc4
$4 {[%eval 352,0] Blunder. Rxc5 was best.} (37... Rxc5) 38. Re8+
{[%eval 344,0]
} Kh7 {[%eval 377,0]} 39. Rh1 {[%eval 391,0]} Rxb2 {[%eval 376,0]} 40.
Bc1+ {
[%eval 388,0]} Kg7 {[%eval 398,0]} 41. Bh6+ {[%eval 338,0]} Kh7 {[%eval
304,0]}
42. Re4 {[%eval 347,0]} Kg6 {[%eval 378,0]} 43. Rxc4 {[%eval 382,0]}
Bxc3 {
[%eval 373,0]} 44. Bf4 {[%eval 387,0]} Rb3 {[%eval 385,0]} 45. Rxa4
{[%eval
395,0]} Bd4 {[%eval 443,0]} 46. Rxd4 {[%eval 464,0]} Rxd4 {[%eval
404,0]} 47.
Rh6+ {[%eval 459,0]} Kg7 {[%eval 444,0]} 48. Rb6 {[%eval 451,0]} Rdd3
{[%eval
456,0]} 49. Be5+ {[%eval 459,0]} Kf8 {[%eval 463,0]} 50. Rxb3 {[%eval
461,0]}
Rxb3 {[%eval 462,0]} 51. Kf4 {[%eval 471,0]} 1-0
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz